Archive for copyright

Copyright restrictions on Bibles

Posted in bible, copyright with tags , on December 13, 2007 by Jason Wells

The problem of publishing Bibles lies in the fact that a particular Biblical translation can be copyrighted as well as the particular publisher. Many Bibles come not just as the text itself, but with notes, comments, indices, appendices or maps. So, particular editions of the Bible as well as the translated text itself carry a burden of dual citizenship.

Here is an overview of several major versions and the copyright notices that they include. Most of them include provision for a limit on the number of verses one may quote at a time, they also include attribution notices and consideration that people will reproduce the translations for small group study, handouts, worksheets, service leaflets or projectors in worship.

Bible publishers are in the odd position of knowing that what they print will be quoted and copied extensively. Different from other publishers, they are often ready to give permission to copy, though often arbitrary.

One thing that none seem to consider is that the Biblical text will be read aloud. Some make provision for audio recording which might be considered to cover this. I wonder about the permission to read the text aloud without recording, particularly according to the limits set out below. Is reading an entire book of the Bible a copyright problem? What about 50% or 25% of a book (as many notices allow)? What about churches that read almost all of Philemon as part of their lectionary? It’s only 25 verses, so it’s easy to read 25-50% of it in one go.

Note that in the US, the King James Version of the Bible is not under any copyright. The cutely-abbreviated World English Bible (WEB) is self-consciously in the public domain. The New English Translation (NET) also propose a more free copyright model: search for “Copyright Innovations – Toward a New Model” on their preface page. Confusingly, they also have this copyright page that isn’t consistent with their other claims.

[New] Revised Standard Bible, National Council of Churches

The [New] Revised Standard Version Bible may be quoted and/or reprinted up to and inclusive of five hundred (500) verses without express written permission of the publisher, provided the verses quoted do not amount to a complete book of the Bible or account for fifty percent (50%) of the total work in which they are quoted….

Read it in full. There’s also a full explanation of their Gratis Use Policy (and notice of fees for exceeding it) on NRSV.org.

New American Bible, Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, US Council of Catholic Bishops

No part of the New American Bible may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner.

(See the copyright notice at the bottom of the preface of this online edition.)

English Standard Version (The Reformation Study Bible), Orlando: Ligonier Ministries, 2005

Permission to quote from the ESV Bible text must be directed to Good News Publishers….

Looking to Good News Publishers, they include this lengthy notice.

New American Standard Bible

The text of the New American Standard Bible(r) may be quoted and/or reprinted up to and inclusive of five hundred (500) verses without express written permission of The Lockman Foundation, providing the verses do not amount to a complete book of the Bible nor do the verses quoted account for more than 25% of the total work in which they are quoted.

(See Permission to Quote at the bottom of the page, along with the attribution clause.)

[Today's] New International [Reader's] Version, Zondervan

They have a lengthy agreement: read it here.

Amplified Bible, Zondervan

Another lengthy agreement: read it here.

Fox, News Corp., and the Bible

Posted in copyright, technology, theology with tags , , , , on December 11, 2007 by Jason Wells

Fox Entertainment acquires Beliefnet was all over last week’s news. One not-covered piece of News Corporation’s involvment was its other holdings. Namely, they own HarperCollins, who publishes the HarperCollins Study Bible (the official Society of Biblical Literature edition) as well as a range of theological works. In turn, HarperCollins owns the label Zondervan, the parachurch, evangelical omnipublisher that puts out everything from Bible versions to The Purpose Driven Life.

So, News Corp owns Fox owns HarperCollins owns Zondervan. Might this imply that if I have a problem with News Corp or Fox that I might want to reconsider whether or not I use my Zondervan NRSV Bible? The next time I have to purchase a study Bible, should I look into Nelson or Oxford instead?

The larger question involved is over the Biblical text and copyright. Should a Christian be interested in copyright-free editions of the Bible? Initially, I’d say yes.

Should we impose legal restrictions on the sharing of the Word? Initially, I’d say no.

Many Bibles do have “license agreements” bound up with them. If Bibles were without licenses and without copyright, would we have (to borrow from Cory Doctorow) fewer Bibles? Fewer versions? Less evangelism? Bible translation and evangelism comes out of a love for God and a desire to know and share God’s love with all people, not from an enterprising corporation with a bottom line as its concern.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.